Results.
| Example | Reference | Records | Largest deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| End rotational stiffness, springs in series | Closed form | 1 | 0% |
| Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 10,000 at end i, end j rigid | Independent calculation | 1 | 0% |
| Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 10,000 at both ends | Independent calculation | 1 | 0% |
| Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 5,000 and 20,000 at the ends | Independent calculation | 1 | 0% |
| One node, two different ends | Closed form | 1 | 0% |
| Portal frame, very stiff spring limit | Independent calculation | 1 | < 0.001% |
| Pin-ended column, buckling | Published source | 1 | < 0.001% |
| Beam with a hinge at mid-span, modal analysis | Independent calculation | 1 | 0.0407% |
Problem. A semi-rigid connection is a rotational spring between the element end and the node. A zero spring stiffness gives a release and an infinite one gives a rigid connection.
Reference document. The series spring relation is used, with the force method for the fixed-end forces. The case with two springs is cross-checked with an independent condensation.
In a semi-rigid connection the end moment is proportional to the relative rotation between the element end and the node.
The connection spring and the end stiffness of the element combine like two springs in series.
Numerical model. The geometric stiffness and the mass matrix pass through the same link, so buckling and modal results are tested as well. In the twin-node model the translations, and are tied and only the in-plane rotation is left independent.
End rotational stiffness, springs in series
Parameters. 4EI/L = 10,666.7 · L = 6
Closed form. Springs in series
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effective stiffness, | 5,161.29 | 5,161.29 | 0% |
Note. The result is exact at all four spring stiffnesses between and .
Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 10,000 at end i, end j rigid
Parameters. w = 12 · L = 6
Independent calculation. The force method, with the spring entering the flexibility diagonal as
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-end moment | 17.4194 | 17.4194 | 0% |
Note. At the rigid end the moment is .
Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 10,000 at both ends
Parameters. w = 12 · L = 6
Independent calculation. The force method, with the spring entering the flexibility diagonal as
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-end moment | 23.4783 | 23.4783 | 0% |
Note. At the rigid end the moment is .
Uniformly distributed load, spring stiffness 5,000 and 20,000 at the ends
Parameters. w = 12 · L = 6
Independent calculation. The force method, with the spring entering the flexibility diagonal as
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-end moment | 14.3363 | 14.3363 | 0% |
Note. At the rigid end the moment is .
One node, two different ends
Parameters. S = 8,000
Closed form. The definition itself, with the end rotation and the end moment obtained along two separate paths
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring moment | 21.4286 | 21.4286 | 0% |
Note. The nodal rotation is -3.683036e-03 while the end rotation of the sprung member is -1.004464e-03. The rigid neighbour at the same node shares the nodal rotation exactly.
Portal frame, very stiff spring limit
Parameters. S = 1,000,000,000,000
Independent calculation. The rigidly connected frame obtained as the spring stiffness goes to infinity
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal translation | 0.0111933 | 0.0111933 | < 0.001% |
Note. A rigid connection gives 1.11933e-02 and a hinge 3.55681e-02, and the intermediate spring stiffnesses (, , ) give 2.52880e-02, 1.41323e-02 and 1.15230e-02.
Pin-ended column, buckling
Parameters. mesh = 16 elements · L = 4
Published source. The critical load of a cantilever column
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical load | 925.275 | 925.276 | < 0.001% |
Note. The convergence runs from 937.50 down to 925.28, from above and monotonically.
Beam with a hinge at mid-span, modal analysis
Parameters. mesh = 8 elements · L = 6
Independent calculation. An independent build, with twin nodes and an equality constraint on the translations
| Quantity | Reference | Computed | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd vertical mode frequency | 288.857 | 288.974 | 0.0407% |
Note. The first three vertical modes are 71.9495, 112.4513 and 288.9744 Hz with condensation and 71.949, 112.4344 and 288.8568 Hz with twin nodes. The difference comes from Guyan reduction.